Are you curious about what it takes to win multi-million-dollar personal injury verdicts in New York?
Discover how attorney Steve Williamson achieved record-setting verdicts in New York personal injury cases. We examine the cases in detail and Steve’s belief that juries will get to the truth if the lawyers give them all the information in an honest way.
But before we proceed, don’t forget that this episode is brought to you by videocasestory.com. Click here if you need help collecting, crafting, and delivering customer stories.
Steve Williamson: Advocate for Justice
Meet Steve Williamson, a New York personal injury lawyer with over 20 years of experience. Known for his dedication and skill in the courtroom, Steve represents ordinary New Yorkers battling against large corporations and big insurance companies.
The Important Role of Juries
In high-stakes legal cases, the jury system often faces scrutiny regarding its fairness and reliability.
Drawing from over two decades of trial experience, Steve Williamson provides insight into the jury system’s effectiveness in finding truth and delivering justice. He argues that jurors, with their common sense and thoughtfulness, can cut through distractions and smokescreens pushed by defense lawyers, confirming the value of our jury system to civil justice in America.
The $10 Million Verdict: A Landmark Case Against Sarah Lawrence College
The case that resulted in a $10 million verdict. Steve Williamson represented Ms. Bako, a senior citizen who suffered significant injuries from a slip-and-fall at Sarah Lawrence College. The jury’s decision was influenced by how Steve and Ms. Bako presented the case. They made the choice to honestly and openly admit all the difficult facts in the case, drawing a contrast with the defense who refused to accept any responsibility or admit obvious facts, and trusting the jury’s ability to put things in context and reach the right result.
Strategy of Openness and Honesty in Court
Steve’s strategy in court centered on openness and honesty, establishing trust with the jury. By presenting all the facts transparently, including the less favorable information, Steve created a sense of trust and credibility with the jury because they realized he was “giving it to them straight.”
Revealing Inconsistencies: The Defense’s Downfall
A turning point in the trial was the exposure of the defense’s inconsistencies and their refusal to acknowledge responsibility, contrasting starkly with Steve’s transparent approach. This not only swayed the jury toward the plaintiff’s side but also raised questions about the defense’s credibility.
Deconstructing a $10 Million Verdict
The jury’s $10 million verdict reflected the jury’s embrace of Ms. Bako’s personal story, her struggles, her suffering, and her spirit to keep fighting despite adversity. This was made possible by her honest acknowledgement of her past medical history and her willingness to accept personal responsibility for her fall if the jury felt the evidence demanded it. The jury appreciated her forthrightness and faith in their ability to find the truth in the case.
Big Verdicts and Their Role in Promoting Public Safety
Large verdicts like this one play a crucial role beyond justice for the individual harmed; they serve as warnings to corporations and individuals to uphold safety standards. By holding parties accountable, these verdicts contribute to the safety of our society, on the roads, in hospitals, in public spaces and with consumer products. The civil justice system ensures justice for injured individuals and families while maintaining a check on negligent conduct throughout society.
Upcoming: Analyzing a $117 Million Verdict
The next part of this series will explore the details behind a remarkable $117+ million verdict, shedding light on the strategies and complexities involved in securing a record-setting result that was the largest personal injury verdict in New York State for 2022.
Watch the full episode now, and make sure to leave any questions or comments you have about the episode.