Are you curious about what it takes to win multi-million-dollar personal injury verdicts in New York?

Discover how attorney Steve Williamson achieved groundbreaking verdicts in New York’s personal injury law. We delve into a $10 million slip-and-fall case and its far-reaching impact, showcasing Steve’s exceptional legal skill and commitment to justice. This series highlights the intersection of legal strategy and jury dynamics in securing significant verdicts.


But before we proceed, don’t forget that this episode is brought to you by Click here if you need help collecting, crafting, and delivering customer stories.


Steve Williamson: Advocate for Justice


Meet Steve Williamson, a New York personal injury lawyer with over 20 years of experience. Known for his dedication and expertise, Steve represents ordinary New Yorkers, battling against corporate giants to uphold their rights.


The Important Role of Juries in Legal Systems


In high-stakes legal cases, the jury system often faces scrutiny regarding its fairness and reliability. Drawing from over two decades of trial experience, Steve Williamson provides insight into the jury system’s effectiveness in finding truth and delivering justice. He argues that jurors, with their common sense and intelligence, can cut through legal distractions, validating the jury system’s critical role in the legal framework.


The $10 Million Verdict: A Landmark Case at Sarah Lawrence College


The case that resulted in a staggering $10 million verdict saw Steve Williamson representing Ms. Bako, who suffered severe injuries from a slip and fall at Sarah Lawrence College. This decision was influenced by the extensive impact on Ms. Bako’s life, including her work capacity and quality of life, highlighting the concept of the “eggshell plaintiff” where the defendant is responsible for all resulting damages, even if the plaintiff had pre-existing vulnerabilities.


The strategy of Openness and Honesty in Court


Williamson’s strategy in court revolved around openness and honesty, establishing trust with the jury. By presenting all facts transparently, including less favorable ones, he aimed to show credibility and allow the jury to make a well-informed decision.


Revealing Inconsistencies: The Defense’s Downfall


A turning point in the trial was the exposure of the defense’s inconsistencies and their refusal to acknowledge responsibility, contrasting starkly with Williamson’s transparent approach. This not only swayed the jury towards the plaintiff’s side but also raised questions about the defense’s credibility.


Decomposing the $10 Million Verdict


The jury’s $10 million verdict was a comprehensive decision, considering both economic and non-economic damages. Williamson emphasized the immense value of non-economic aspects like quality of life, leading the jury to see the verdict as a just compensation for Ms. Bako’s extensive losses.


Big Verdicts and Their Role in Promoting Public Safety


Large verdicts like this one play a crucial role beyond individual compensation; they serve as warnings to corporations and individuals to uphold safety standards. By holding parties accountable, these verdicts contribute significantly to societal safety. The civil justice system, with its core of jury trials, ensures justice for affected individuals and families and maintains a check on negligent behaviors.

This case exemplifies the power and importance of the jury system in delivering justice. It’s a testament to the balance and fairness that our legal system strives to achieve through the combined efforts of dedicated professionals and a conscientious jury.


Upcoming: Analyzing a $117 Million Verdict


The next part of this series will explore the intricacies of a remarkable $117 million verdict, shedding light on the strategies and complexities involved in securing such monumental results in legal battles, especially in cases without wrongful death.


Watch the full episode now, and make sure to leave any questions or comments you have about the episode.